Price Pullback, Position Structure Still Consolidating Last week, Bitcoin briefly fell below 77,000 USD, and this weekend it has been consolidating around that level. The backdrop for this pullback includes hot inflation data, rising oil prices, and the market repricing expectations for a more hawkish Fed stance. On September 11, U.S. spot BTC ETFs recorded approximately 13.29 million USD in net outflows, marking the fourth consecutive trading day of outflows. ETF Flows: Short-Term Cooling, Not a Full Retreat Looking only at consecutive outflow days can easily lead to misjudging it as institutional withdrawal, but extending the timeframe reveals a different picture. For the week ending September 4, U.S. spot BTC ETFs recorded approximately 986.9 million USD in weekly net inflows. Medium-term allocation demand has not disappeared; short-term funds are simply reducing exposure ahead of macro events—this is risk-management behavior, not confirmation of a trend reversal. This Week’s Two Major Risk Windows The first risk point is the September 15 CLARITY Act Senate procedural vote (cloture vote). This vote decides “whether to proceed to formal debate,” not whether the bill ultimately passes; even if it clears the threshold, multiple procedural steps remain before it reaches the President’s desk for signature. If the market interprets “entering consideration” directly as “regulatory clarity,” it risks overestimating the short-term bullish impact. The second risk point is the September 16 FOMC rate decision, dot plot, and Chair press conference. The key focus of this meeting is not just the rate move itself, but the Fed’s wording on the future path of rates. If retail sales data are strong, price pressures have not eased, and the post-meeting tone is hawkish, the dollar and Treasury yields could rise together, pressuring BTC; conversely, if signals are more dovish, risk assets may attract fresh buying. Notably, U.S. August retail sales and import/export price indexes are also scheduled for September 16 (20:30 Taipei time), right before the FOMC decision release, making it the last major macroeconomic data point ahead of the meeting. Technical View: 77,000 USD as the Divide, 76,000 USD as the Defense Line The area around 77,000 USD is currently the short-term bull-bear watershed, while 76,000 USD is a relatively important defensive zone. If ETF outflows persist, the FOMC stance turns more hawkish, and price breaks below the defense zone, leveraged-position cascades could amplify the decline; conversely, if regulatory developments are positive, the Fed does not signal further tightening, and funds flow back in, BTC may have another chance to challenge the 78,000–80,000 USD range. Conclusion This week is not suitable for heavy bets on a single direction. Rather than predicting the outcome of the news itself, it is more important to observe whether price can hold support after the news lands and whether ETF flows return. Controlling leverage and avoiding chasing prices before the two major events are announced will be more practical than guessing the results. ⚠️This article is for market information and research reference only and does not constitute investment advice.

CLARITY Act Vote, Wait-and-See Pattern Before FOMC Decision #BTC

BTC daily transaction count surged from 300,000–400,000 in January this year to 550,000–900,000 in June–July, indicating a clear increase in trading activity. <img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/4ffffb4e-3bc1-4527-9eaf-dc0567775db7.avif" />However, the number of active addresses has not expanded synchronously, and has even slightly contracted.<img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/33ad0c29-df48-4cb8-92fb-e803dadd32bc.avif" />What does this represent? It seems more like "existing funds are being reallocated more frequently" rather than "a large influx of new users". On the exchange side, it is also relatively moderate: net outflow of about 1,000 coins in June, about 6,000 in July. Selling pressure is not heavy, and there is even a slight tendency to accumulate coins, but the intensity is not at an institutional level of aggressive buying.<img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/f1fb1825-0983-446a-a3c7-854b4769ce34.avif" />In terms of valuation, MVRV is between 1.15–1.25, significantly lower than the high point in October last year—no overbought conditions, but there is no evidence yet of incremental funds actively entering the market.<img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/ad7a6027-e081-4ed5-b735-401ebe421055.avif" />🔮Conclusion: On-chain structure is neutral, with no panic selling of holdings; however, the divergence of "volume increase without price synchronization" reminds us that it is not yet time for a reversal. Other data even suggests that consolidation may extend through the entire month of August. So for now, everyone should be patient, avoid excessive operations, and wait for favorable conditions to arrive.

BTC's Road to Recovery: Trading Volume Increases, But Price Lags Behind #BTC

In this cycle, what's most chilling isn't someone accidentally clicking a phishing link, but that even long-term holders who believe in Bitcoin can get hurt in what they consider the safest self-custody environment. According to on-chain analysis compiled from reports: hackers emptied a large number of addresses in a short time, showing highly automated characteristics (such as fixed fee rate patterns and no change outputs). More critically, the incident clues point to an "old firmware RNG flaw" that may have reduced entropy during seed generation, making private keys more susceptible to brute-force cracking. <blockquote>not your key, not your coin That's right; but the reality is:</blockquote><blockquote>your key can also cease to be yours due to the generation process, backup habits, or single points of dependency.</blockquote> <h2>First, Build a Threat Model: Who and What Exactly Are You Defending Against?</h2> Clarify the risks so you know where to invest your time. Here are the 6 most common threat categories: Seed / Private Key Generation Weaknesses: Insufficient entropy, RNG flaws, passive/active side-channel attacks Single Point of Failure: A single hardware wallet, a single seed, a single backup location Passphrase / PIN / Unlock Process Risks: Weak passwords, reuse, social engineering Backup Leakage: Photos, cloud sync, local notes, malware scraping Supply Chain and Firmware Risks: Not updating, or untrusted update sources Human Process Risks: Rushed transfers, no small-amount testing, no exit/alternative plans <h2>A Protection Plan Executable from Beginner to Advanced</h2> Layer 1: Eliminate Single Points of Failure First (Most Important) If you only have one hardware wallet, one seed, and one backup location—you're essentially betting that "this single point will never fail." Recommended approach (intermediate level and up, strongly advised for long-term holders): Use a multisig wallet architecture Combine at least 2 different hardware wallet brands (each generating its own seed independently) The goal is to shift risk from "one breach = total loss" to "multiple simultaneous breaches required" Layer 2: Actively Add Entropy During Seed Generation — Insurance Against Weak RNG (Random Number Generator) The core idea is: don't rely 100% on the device's default process that "looks random." Feasible methods: If your tool/process allows, add your own randomness source when generating the seed (e.g., rolling dice offline) Use "process" to hedge against "device or version errors" Layer 3: Add a Strong Passphrase (Turn the Seed into Something Requiring a Second Key) BIP-39 Passphrase (often called the 25th word) is a very effective second layer of security. Recommendations: Use a long, unguessable Passphrase resistant to dictionary attacks Do not store the Passphrase in the same place as the seed Do not use birthdays, phone numbers, or common phrases Layer 4: Backups Must Resist Leaks, Disasters, and Your Own Forgetfulness Iron rule: never photograph the seed, never upload to the cloud, never store in computer/phone notes. Especially if your computer runs various programs/Agents, assume it could eventually encounter malware or data scraping. Backup SOP: Seed: handwritten (or on more durable material), laminate or use fireproof/waterproof containers when necessary At least two backups, stored in different locations (reduce fire/theft/single-point disaster risk) Perform a "recovery drill": ensure you can actually recover the wallet from the backup Layer 5: Firmware Updates + Knowledge Updates (Attack Methods Keep Evolving) Update firmware (and verify sources and validation process) More importantly: updating firmware does not automatically make old seeds safe If you suspect the seed generation timing/version falls within a risk range, plan: Small test → batch migration → new seed/new addresses → disable old addresses Layer 6: Large Assets Can Use Hybrid Custody (Not Surrender, But Risk Management) For large assets that "could affect your life if something goes wrong," use a layered approach: Portion: self-custody (multisig + distributed) Portion: regulated institutional custody (based on personal trust and risk preference) Portion: daily liquidity hot wallet (kept within acceptable loss range) <h2>Ready-to-Use Checklist</h2> Beginner (First-Time Self-Custody) — 7 Items - [ ] Do not put all assets in the same wallet/same seed - [ ] Do not photograph the seed, do not upload to cloud, do not store in phone/computer notes - [ ] After writing down the seed, perform an "offline recovery drill" (confirm it's copied correctly) - [ ] Set a strong PIN/unlock code (do not reuse) - [ ] Test receiving and sending with small amounts first - [ ] Regularly check firmware updates and official announcements - [ ] Keep daily spending funds in a hot wallet, large amounts in cold storage (layered) Experienced Self-Custodians (Advanced) — 10 Items - [ ] Implement multisig, e.g., 2-of-3 / 3-of-5 (based on your situation) - [ ] Use at least two different hardware wallet brands (reduce supply chain/firmware single points) - [ ] Add extra entropy during seed generation (if tool supports) - [ ] Use a strong Passphrase and store it separately from the seed - [ ] Distribute backup locations (fire/theft/single-point disaster resistance) - [ ] Establish an "emergency migration" plan: how to move assets in batches within 24–72 hours upon discovering major risks - [ ] Perform "isolated environment" operations before important actions (clean computer/offline process) - [ ] Avoid tying asset management workflows to your main machine that runs various programs/Agents - [ ] Regular review: has your setup quietly returned to single-point dependency? - [ ] For important wallets, make minimal plans for "inheritance/emergency access" (avoid being the only one who knows)

It's Not 'Just Put It in a Cold Wallet and You're Safe': An Article Clearly Explaining Self-Custody Risk Models and Protection SOP

BTC Bitcoin spot price has surged from around 64K to 66K in the past two days, prompting many to ask: is this wave driven by genuine capital inflows, or another rally fueled by leverage? Combining several on-chain and exchange indicators, the answer is not difficult to piece together. Short Squeeze Ignites, but Leverage Keeps Adding Funding rates turned negative around 7/18-19, indicating bearish sentiment at the time, which triggered the initial rebound through a short squeeze. Interestingly, the rally did not stop after the squeeze—open interest (OI) climbed in tandem from about 21.2B to a new high of 23B, moving almost in sync with the price. This suggests the short squeeze was merely the fuse, while the sustained upward momentum is supported by continuously incoming new leveraged positions rather than a one-time short covering event. Although funding rates have also risen, they remain in a moderate range and have not yet reached overheated or crowded levels. <img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/9b6bfbe7-c813-4325-a5d1-c271e10e1aac.avif" /> Spot Buying Has Not Followed The performance of the spot market tells a different story. CryptoQuant’s volume classification shows that spot trading volume has remained in a “Cooling” state since April, including the most recent day—indicating that off-exchange real-money buying of spot is quite limited. In contrast, futures volume has stayed in “Neutral” and “Heating” zones, not cooling with spot but also not flashing overheating signals. In other words, this rally appears more like funds in the derivatives market betting against each other to amplify volatility, with no significant increase in spot market participation.<img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/a594d247-38dc-4680-aafc-64bdec509a5f.avif" /> Off-Exchange Capital Stays on the Sidelines Net stablecoin flows on exchanges have remained negative recently, indicating that “ammunition” previously parked on exchanges ready to enter is flowing out. However, looking at the total stablecoin market cap over a longer period, there has been no collapse—only slower growth and high-side consolidation. This shows that capital is not fleeing the crypto market en masse but is choosing to temporarily withdraw from exchanges and stay on the sidelines.<img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/8940d0d8-bb32-47d5-a7b6-91c19dbe03a2.avif" /> ETF Flows: Institutions Are Gradually Re-entering, but Scale Remains Limited Notably, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs have recorded net inflows for the second consecutive week. On 7/20, inflows reached approximately $271M, led by IBIT, with ARK, Fidelity, and other funds also participating. ETF subscriptions ultimately translate into actual buying in the spot market, and IBIT leading the inflows is typically seen as a signal of institutions and long-term capital re-adding exposure rather than mere short-term testing of the waters. <img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/6a81a255-65e8-4626-a82c-f7062bdac74e.avif" /> However, when compared with the earlier spot volume classification, the overall spot market remains in a “Cooling” state, indicating that the scale of ETF inflows has not been sufficient to push the broader spot market temperature indicator out of the cooling zone. In other words, institutional capital is gradually re-entering via ETFs, but retail and general spot market participation remains relatively subdued, creating a divergence in pace between the two. 💡Conclusion Overall, this rebound toward 66K is more accurately described as: a short-term short squeeze igniting the move, with leveraged positions continuing to add and push prices higher, yet spot buying and off-exchange incremental capital have not followed. Historically, such a structure tends to see rapid corrections when momentum fades, because the price is supported by easily liquidated leveraged positions rather than stickier spot buying. There are no overheating signals yet, but it cannot be called a robust rally—before chasing prices, investors should pay closer attention to whether spot volume and stablecoin flows can truly catch up.

Bitcoin Nearing $67,000: Real Demand or Leverage Mirage? #BTC

Bitcoin and Ethereum have rebounded significantly since the weekend, with gains of 6.7% and nearly 5% respectively. Market sentiment indicators have warmed in tandem to the "Extreme Greed" zone. More notably, spot ETF fund flow data shows institutional capital making large-scale replenishments on the latest trading day Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a single-day net inflow of as much as $999 million, with BlackRock’s IBIT contributing $381.4 million, Fidelity FBTC contributing $238.8 million, and ARK ARKB contributing $289.1 million. This equates to buying pressure of nearly 12,000 BTC. However, ETF fund inflows are only one piece of the puzzle driving the rally. Key drivers behind this rally: Spot buying turns strong first: Real buying support appears first, followed by shorts being forced to cover.Short squeeze amplifies gains: Single-day Bitcoin short liquidations reached $345 million, acting as an accelerator. <img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/84e3268e-1316-4b73-a092-2bbc4015d7b8.avif" />

比特幣、以太幣周末以來出現顯著反彈，漲幅分別達 6.7% 與近 5%。市場情緒指標同步升溫至「極度貪婪」區間。更值得留意的是，現貨 ETF 資金流數據顯示，機構資金在最新交易日出現大額回補 比特幣現貨 ETF 單日淨流入高達 9.99 億美元，其中貝萊德 IBIT 貢獻 381.4 百萬美元、Fidelity FBTC 貢獻 238.8 百萬美元、ARK ARKB 貢獻 289.1 百萬美元。 這相當於接近 12,000 顆 BTC 的買盤。不過，ETF 的資金回流只是推升行情的其中一塊拼圖。 以下是這次上漲的關鍵推力： 現貨買盤先行轉強：先出現真實買盤支撐，隨後空頭被迫回補。空單擠壓放大漲勢：單日比特幣空單爆倉金額高達 3.45 億美元，成為加速器。 <img src="https://static2.fansone.co/images/84e3268e-1316-4b73-a092-2bbc4015d7b8.avif" /> </p

Bitcoin Rebounds, ETF Funds See Nearly $1 Billion Inflow

ผลงานอื่นของผู้สร้าง

CLARITY Act Vote, Wait-and-See Pattern Before FOMC Decision #BTC

BTC's Road to Recovery: Trading Volume Increases, But Price Lags Behind #BTC

It's Not 'Just Put It in a Cold Wallet and You're Safe': An Article Clearly Explaining Self-Custody Risk Models and Protection SOP

Bitcoin Nearing $67,000: Real Demand or Leverage Mirage? #BTC

การแนะนำสุ่มผลงาน

One Song, One Story----《This Second, Are You Okay?》

【Taipei】Zhongshan Station Gourmet｜扑通扑通1990 Korean Cuisine Specialty Store Takes You to Korea in One Second! Super Authentic Chuncheon Stir-Fried Chicken, No Need to Handle It Yourself, Just Eat, All-You-Can-Eat Side Dishes, High CP Value Korean Style

A Little Afternoon in the Cafe

Qike Fantasy World -- Ghost Month Taboos (4)